Social Media Should Be Fun, Not Depressing
This excerpt from The Brave Athlete explains why social media depression is common and how athletes can keep their Internet use healthy.
Heading out the door? Read this article on the new Outside+ app available now on iOS devices for members! Download the app.
This excerpt is adapted from The Brave Athlete by Dr. Simon Marshall and Lesley Paterson. Their cutting-edge brain training guide solves the 13 most common mental conundrums athletes face in their everyday training and in races. With The Brave Athlete, you can solve these problems to become mentally strong and make your brain your most powerful asset.
How to Filter Truthiness and Bullsh*t
Social media should work for you, not against you.
Because of the psychological drive for self-presentation, it’s impossible to expect impression management software—Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, Tumblr, Snapchat, Strava, Endomondo, RunKeeper, Runtastic, MapMyRIDE, Garmin Connect, or the 2,479 other data-logging social networks—to be suddenly used for sharing stories of your own perceived failures, inadequacies or awkwardness, or evidence of your otherwise humdrum life.
Because impression management software is everywhere and always on, your brain gets exhausted. Your dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, the brain’s processor of social pain and emotional discomfort, is getting worked like a distance runner at CrossFit.
The trick is to know how to manage this barrage so you don’t feel like you’re losing a social status game. After all, if obesity, happiness, smoking, substance abuse, and voting habits can spread through online social networks, you better believe that impression management tactics of athletes can too.
Here are some words of advice to athletes who use social media.
1. Facebook isn’t the problem; you are
See social networks for what they are: carefully designed opportunities for people to “self-present” in the most favorable way possible.
If you find yourself looking at other people’s profiles, run-group selfies, screen grabs from their sports watch, or their badass training sessions—and you think WOW, this person is the real deal, closely followed by I wish I had their life, know that you’ve been duped. You are seeing selective nondisclosure. They show you only the parts that are literally awesome or give off an aroma of awesome. They’re not as fit, strong, happy, and as perfect as they seem. No one is. This isn’t a criticism of them, either. They’re simply very good at impression management.
For every single instance of masterful impression management that is uploaded, posted, or selfied, there are 10 hiding behind it of a straggly, exhausted, disorganized mess. This is the human condition. The more perfection they sell you, the worse the problem usually is. Trust me.
2. Stalking versus grazing—know the dangers
If you’ve been surviving on a diet of social media grazing and stalking (observing, not posting), then you might want to reconsider why you do it. First, you need to know whether you’re predominantly a grazer or a stalker. A Facebook “grazer” is someone who cares little for social media but still enjoys the sort of pseudo-connection that it creates—perhaps seeing what family members are up to or being able to vicariously enjoy the micro-successes of your loved ones without actually being there in person. No harm in that. Enjoy.
Conversely, a Facebook “stalker” is someone who enters the Facebook world a little deeper but with targeted, lingering, and slightly more sinister motivations. We’re not talking about “stalking” in the sense of illegal harassment, but in urban dictionary terms—peering anonymously (but legally) into someone’s public presence online for the purpose of curiosity, judgment, or plain ol’ voyeuristic pleasure. We all do it. It’s what makes Facebook fun. That said, we prefer not to use the word “stalking” because, well, it isn’t really that. It’s more akin to intrigue fishing, helped by a modicum of reciprocity and passive consent, at least in the Facebook world.
It’s mostly guilt and shame that helps the healthy brain know where to draw the line. Our goal here isn’t to help you draw moral lines in the sand over whom you choose to peek at, how frequently, or why, but we do offer you this general word of caution: If you find yourself doing this a lot, research suggests that you’re probably headed down an emotional dark alley. Excessive intrigue fishing seems partly fueled by feelings of inadequacy—the breeding ground for envy. And envy rarely ends well. It’s a gateway drug to depression, resentment, and schadenfreude.
If you’re an athlete who only grazes or stalks on Facebook, you could also be a kind of bully. All take and no give. A healthy self-presentation requires a broadcast channel. So use it. If you’re feeling self-conscious about making a disclosure, losing anonymity, or being poked fun at, your impression management system needs a bit of foreplay from your self-judgment system.
3. Low self-worth or low self-esteem might be your problem
Envy is an emotional response born out of a sense of discontent or inadequacy about someone else’s possessions or attributes, like success, attractiveness, popularity, talent, or fitness. It represents a self-evaluation threat that pisses off your Chimp. When your Chimp brain doesn’t feel threatened by another person’s self-presentation shenanigans, you don’t feel envious. Simple as that. You might feel slightly annoyed, indifferent, or even a twinge of scorn and condescension—but envy isn’t in the mix, for three reasons:
- Your self-judgment system (self-worth, -esteem, and -confidence) is sufficiently strong to not internalize threats to self,
- The incoming impression management tactic is so blatant and exaggerated that it’s actually funny, or worse, tragic (e.g., the questionable behavior of some men experiencing a “midlife crisis”), or
- The person you are being compared to is already lower on the totem pole on the attribute or possession in question. Hence social status was never under threat in the first place.
When an athlete has low self-worth or low self-esteem, the “threat threshold” is artificially low. He or she lives in an ever-present state of inadequacy and discontent, and the slightest whiff of another person’s impression management broadcast is invariably perceived as a threat. This leads to a cascade of negative emotion that feeds into the existing narrative—Oh that’s just great. Yet more proof that I’m talentless and slow.
Some athletes respond by amplifying their own self-presentation even more—greater pretense, more exaggeration, and more selective disclosure—flattering selfies, podium shots, accomplishments, and race results dominate their posts. The grazers and stalkers, those with low self-worth or self-esteem who don’t put an offensive team on the field, simmer with disappointment, resentment, and envy—a breeding ground for depression. Let’s try to break those cycles.
4. Remember your brain is biased
Your brain takes shortcuts (175 at the last count) to reduce cognitive effort and become quicker and more efficient at making decisions. The strategies it uses are often named according to the mistakes it makes along the way—referred to as cognitive biases.
When you look at other people with envy or admiration, you tend to fall into the trap of the halo effect. The halo effect refers to our tendency to let an impression about someone in one area influence our impression about them in another. It need not be as obvious as thinking they’re probably good at everything, but instead can be extremely subtle, such as giving them the benefit of the doubt, being more forgiving of their bad decisions, or assuming their intentions must be good. Just because the badass athlete next door posts pictures of her smiling husband on Facebook, it doesn’t mean that her relationship is perfect or that she’s even happy. Of course, she might well be, but that’s not the point (or your business). It’s the fact you may be using information from one aspect of someone’s life to make assumptions about another. This can fan the flames of envy even more.
Another mental shortcut we use is called an “availability bias,” which refers to our tendency to use information that is close to hand when forming opinions about people and things. In this context, “close to hand” simply means things that you can most readily recall about them. Facebook serves up so many examples that are curated for quick-access memory (e.g., short pieces of text, photos, shares) that it’s no wonder we think certain people are better than they are—we’re often just subconsciously regurgitating their own highlight reel. Conversely, if you hold negative opinions about a certain race team, you might automatically assume that you probably won’t get on with an athlete who races for that team.
The Brave Athlete will help you filter truthiness and bullsh*t by giving you simple strategies to make social media fun again.
Why Your Online Friends Can Make You Feel Like Crap
The “Chimp,” “Professor” and “Computer” Sides Of Your Brain
[velopress cta=”See more!” align=”center” title=”About This Book”]